Re: Attention, dependency fighters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/09/2012 01:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 07:12:50AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
firewalld isn't in the minimal comps groups. However, it's pulled in
by anaconda, see pyanaconda/install.py:
     # anaconda requires storage packages in order to make sure the target
     # system is bootable and configurable, and some other packages in order
     # to finish setting up the system.
     packages = storage.packages + ["authconfig", "firewalld"]
Why do anaconda dependencies end up in the minimal install ? That
shouldn't really be necessary, right ? It has always bugged me the we
end up with anaconda on the installed system when installing from a live
cd.
The storage packages are going to be needed for the system to boot.

Anaconda could probably add some smarts to remove authconfig if it wasn't
pulled in by anything in the selected comps, but I'm not sure it'd be worth
the special logic -- we might as well just put it in @core (even though it's
not super-tiny).

Firwealld I don't know about, though. If anaconda sets up the firewall using
firewalld but then doesn't install it, will the old iptables scripts load
the configuration? It'd be nice if it could, because firewalld is *another*
big change that it'd be nice to have a reasonable back-out plan for.




You might want to remove plymouth from the minimal install since it does not make sense having it there anyway

JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux