On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:32 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
<johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 03:58 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
>>
>> Not true. As with our other major changes, we new it would be absolutely
>> impossible to deliver all functionality in a single release.
>
>
> What exactly prevented the Anaconda from implementing Anaconda 2.0 in a F19
> or later when it was fully complete?
>
> Or if I rephrase why could not the community continue to use Anaconda in
> it's form that it existed in F17 until the "new installer" was *completly*
> done?
Well, FESCo _did_ approve the plan to move to F18 with no contingency
plan. The blame here is on FESCo, not on Anaconda.
Yes, it was a major error; we could have at that point insisted on
keeping the F17 implementation working, and it probably would have
been easier at that point to maintain two branches than to backport
nobody-knows-what now.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
