On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 07:49 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > David Cantrell wrote: > > The scope was not a surprise to us, we knew from the beginning when we > > started this that the delivery of all newui work would have to be staged > > across multiple Fedora releases. The key was getting groups like Fedora > > QA and FESCo involved early so that they understood and would help us > > agree on what list of items should be priority #1, followed by priority > > #2, and so on. > > Planned regressions are just plain unacceptable. The rewrite should never > have entered Rawhide before being ready (or expected to be ready by that > release's Alpha). Either maintain a stable branch in parallel, or if you > can't do that, don't do the rewrite at all! And you are of course offering to help to either: 1) Patch the regressions 2) maintain the stable branch in parallel with the development branch (with all the arguments which have been mentioned earlier on this list as to why this was not done) Thank you Kevin! Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
