On 11/08/2012 05:04 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>1) highly user visible changes (beyond artwork or theme changes) * Possibly. I'm unclear as to precisely what has changed here. If it's just the default but the user can select custom partitioning and is able to use LVM there, then this is less valid. If it is no longer possible to customize the install to use LVM then this is very vali
The Anaconda version in the latest smoke test ( and few before that ) actually brings the ability to choose to use standard partitioning ( ext4 only ), lvm and btrfs so the whole "lvm not being the default" discussion was kinda needless since a) this is not a regression from F17 ( the installer offered to do that in F17 ) b) It's equally hard/easy for those that want or do not want lvm to simply choose to use or not use the lvm layout.
I honestly am not so sure they actually had to specifically get "approval" to make the change from the storage developers,community or fesco for that matter...
JBG -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
