Re: Fedora 18 Beta to slip by two weeks, Beta release date is now Nov 27

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 05:44 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 06:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > The new anaconda UI and related features are more or less
> > > > entirely the
> > > > cause of the slip.
> > > 
> > > This shows that those changes should not have been done, or at
> > > least not in
> > > this way.
> > 
> > I think it's widely agreed by now that they could have been done
> > better,
> > the question is now exactly how we can improve the process.
> 
> We have bigger issue with features that are OUT OF the process,
> not communicated at all. If you take a look on New Installer UI,
> it fits current design, it was a late as the scope was bigger
> than Anaconda team thought but it's there.
> 
> But the new upgrade process - it should be standalone feature,
> we missed dracut feature, same for LVM in Anaconda (again, not
> UI), live medias etc. So most of the problems were caused not by 
> proposed/accepted features but by real features we weren't aware of.
> 
> How to avoid it? Honestly I don't know. 

Well, a more stringent review process for the New UI feature would
likely have identified this problem ahead of time.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux