Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/05/2012 01:11 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:55:38 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
and one "stable" release ( valid for 2 maybe 3 years ) for those in the
community that want something they dont constantly having to upgrade to
and can deploy on their servers. ( ofcourse to have a stable release we
first and foremost would need maintainers willing to maintain the
distribution for that time, epel could maybe be simply dropped for that
).

That's called CentOS,
Nope ... CentOS/RHEL is a different end of extremes.

7 years+ life-time, no API changes, etc.

What is lacking is a middle ground between "Fedora" and "CentOS".

Something with a life-time of "~2 years", with API increments etc.

Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux