On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:12 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 09:37 -0200, Henrique Junior wrote: > > > >> The guys behind openSUSE created a good approach with Tumbleweed. By > >> adding this repo users can opt-in to the (semi)rolling model. > >> Tumbleweed is more like a pool where updated, stable, non disruptive > >> software can be installed and I was able to talk to the guy who > >> created Tumbleweed some time ago. He said that it is easy to maintain > >> and takes only a few minutes a day to check things. > >> It is difficult, for example, to understand why we have to wait until > >> the next release to have LibreOffice 3.6, since this seems an non > >> disruptive update that could bring major improvements in the > >> productivity of users who rely on office suites to work. > > > >I don't think that *adding* tracks is an approach that is going to > >solve > >any of our problems, though it might add convenience for a small set of > >users. We need to be making things simpler, not more complex. :) > > And in many cases it's simpler to have security updates for an LTS Fedora version than upgrading X workstations every 6 or 12 months. I meant 'simpler for developers', not 'simpler for users'. This is, after all, the developer list :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
