Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 02.11.2012 17:25, schrieb Tom Lane:
> =?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?= <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:12:56PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>>> Dead/un-maintained packages need to be removed/reassigned at the
>>>> very *beginning* of an new development cycle so feature owners and
>>>> others working in the community are dealing with active and actively
>>>> maintained packages.
> 
> How exactly are you going to force maintainers who go missing to do so
> at a prescheduled time?  Real life is seldom that convenient

well, it would maybe a start to DROP packages which are still
missing systemd-units or do fedora tend to have this "feature"
another 5 releases, currently it is the FOURTH

do not tell me packages where the maintainer until know did not
hear the shoot that Fedora uses systemd since more than year
is well maintained at all

again: this "feature" should have been finalized at F15
_________________________________

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/18/FeatureList

60% 	
SysV to Systemd 	
Porting from sysVinit init scripts to systemd unit files	
2012-06-05

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux