On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:49:01PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Colin Walters (walters@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 16:04 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > > It looks like libffi is emitted into the minimal buildroot (rpm-build -> > > > pkg-config -> glib2 -> libffi), so during the transition we'll need to > > > build both sonames of libffi. It might be worth keeping a compat-libffi > > > around for a release or two anyway, the current soname has a _long_ history. > > > > Or just apply the patch from here: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/165871.html > > And skip tons of pain for all the libffi consumers at the tiny cost of a > > stub symbol. > > > > Hm, no links to the patch in the archives. Well, I'll attach it again, > > since I still have it sitting around in my libffi git checkout. > > And note that whatever you do, F-19 is open for doing it now - you don't > need to wait until F-18 ships... > And has been since August. Development starts when rawhide and F-next branch. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpK2GXH6XRnS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel