On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > > He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of > > %systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of > > %systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by default and honoring whatever > > presets are set for the spin. > > > > This approach allows for spec files to be synced between all Fedora > > branches and generate the appropriate scriptlets for each release when > > built. > > This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final > state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain. Once F20 rolls out and F17 goes EOL, maintainers can simply s/systemd_post_enable/systemd_post/ and then things won't be so ugly (or final). -- Scott Schmit
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
