Re: Fedora-Review 0.2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Paul Howarth (2012-08-02 16:46:39)
> On 08/02/2012 03:36 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > On 08/02/2012 08:29 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >> Maybe it would be better formulated as:
> >> [!]: MUST: Buildroot MUST NOT be present (NOTE: this is not true for
> >> EPEL5)
> >> [!]: MUST: Package MUST NOT run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
> >> at the beginning of %install
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > That would definitely be clearer to me.
> 
> Where is the guideline that says (as a MUST) that buildroot definition 
> and cleaning must not be done (except for EPEL5)?

Just FYI this (and many other) bugs have been fixed in 0.2.2 release
(currently on way to updates-testing[1,2])

[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.2.2-1.fc16
[2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.2.2-1.fc17



-- 
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux