On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:15:54PM +0000, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 18:21:32 GMT, David Cantrell wrote: > > I do dislike having two line editing libraries, but whatever. > > libreadline being full-fledged GPLv3+ makes it hard to justify in BSD > projects. For such a commonly used library, it being GPL rather than > LGPL makes little sense to me, but that's the way it is. I understand the reason, but it's less of a technical reason and more just a licensing annoyance. That's all I wanted to point out. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
