Re: Package with no upstream (ftp)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:55:55 -0400
> David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Or forget the netkit source.  I'd like to see ftp(1) replaced with the
> > NetBSD ftp client:
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/tnftp/
> 
> But we already have a yet nicer FTP client, lftp. Really not point in
> tinkering with the plain FTP this way, it seems to me.

Yeah, keep plain-old "ftp" as simple as possible.  lftp is great, but it
has more dependencies, and I have had occasion when I needed to fall
back to the old standby.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux