On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:10:20AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > On 07/18/2012 10:43 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:19 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > >> Hello all, > >> > >> what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and no upstream source? > >> I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should I just let them there, put a note in a comment or > >> just remove them? > > > > Upload it to fedorahosted, gitorious, github, or whatever. Even if > > you're the only person with access initially, it's still useful as a > > possible code sharing mechanism with other distributions, etc. And > > who knows, maybe someone will come along and submit patches. > > > > > > Sounds reasonable. Thank you. Or forget the netkit source. I'd like to see ftp(1) replaced with the NetBSD ftp client: ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/tnftp/ Used to be called lukemftp a long time ago. Much nicer than netkit ftp but still simple and works like people expect the BSD ftp(1) command to work. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
