On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 21:58 +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: > 2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques <nmo.marques@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail > >> tomorrow or during the weekend the links to this list. > > > > Let's get an accurate picture of what is actually left for vendor > > patches before we decide the current situation is a non-starter. And > > then try to categorize them as critical or not. End of the day, a > > compromise will most likely have to be made with some non-critical > > patches not being included, with Fedora's version of Unity being less > > capable than Ubuntu's Unity desktop until the patches can be > > refactored in a way that they are upstreamable. I'm willing to help > > where I can with any changes that lead to submittable packages. > > I'm not involved in this project anyway; If this is going forward, I > don't mind co-maintaining a few packages, I would prefer the indicator > stack as it's the components I know better. Either way my > interventions were not meant to promote this initiative or to bash it. > I've only tried to share a few issues I found in the past, though I'm > willing to help co-maintaining a 'few' packages, not the whole stack, > I don't have time for it. Note for the record - I'm perfectly willing to give up my maintainership of the few packages I own from my old abortive effort to package Unity. I have bamf, libindicator and probably one or two others I forgot about. If anyone wants these, just ping me. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
