2012/7/19 Jef Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Nelson Marques <nmo.marques@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I've asked Ken to provide me some additional info on this; I will mail >> tomorrow or during the weekend the links to this list. > > Let's get an accurate picture of what is actually left for vendor > patches before we decide the current situation is a non-starter. And > then try to categorize them as critical or not. End of the day, a > compromise will most likely have to be made with some non-critical > patches not being included, with Fedora's version of Unity being less > capable than Ubuntu's Unity desktop until the patches can be > refactored in a way that they are upstreamable. I'm willing to help > where I can with any changes that lead to submittable packages. I'm not involved in this project anyway; If this is going forward, I don't mind co-maintaining a few packages, I would prefer the indicator stack as it's the components I know better. Either way my interventions were not meant to promote this initiative or to bash it. I've only tried to share a few issues I found in the past, though I'm willing to help co-maintaining a 'few' packages, not the whole stack, I don't have time for it. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
