On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 23:28 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote: > > So far, the only actual arguments against this (specifically, the > above solution to the problem) I've heard is that it breaks being able > to configure /boot/grub2/grub.cfg by hand. But that's the idea behind > grub2, for better or worse. The documentation specifically tells you > NOT to edit that file, but to instead edit configuration in /etc. > > Most of the other arguments raised in response to this seem to have > really been about grub2 itself, and if Fedora has to use it, so.. are > there any other thoughts on the actual matter at hand? grub2-mkconfig is inherently a more 'destructive' operation than grubby, is really my only thought. But I wouldn't mind the change much at all. pjones' opinion would be the most valuable to have, I guess. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
