Am 19.06.2012 09:53, schrieb drago01: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 18/06/12 09:30, drago01 wrote: >>> >>> This would just result into stagnation while the competition invents >>> much better wheels and leave us behind. >> >> >> Abstracting for the sake of discussion from the particular case of grub2 >> could you at least imagine new program which would be worse than the program >> it replaces? > > Sure. But a new program can as well be better then the one it replaces > even if the other one has been in use for years. Not even trying to > improve the old or replace it with something better that comes up > means stagnation which is what I am objecting to.You have to make > changes to go forward. but it is NIT better it is a config full of crap and script-code this is pervers - short time ago there was introduced systemd saying "shell scripts are evil" and directly after that we introduce a boot-loader with a configuration where each init-script ever existed was nice compared against CIONFIGURATION != SHELL-SCRIPT
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
