On 06/19/2012 09:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'll add to that to note that we now have Xfce, LXDE and Sugar all on
the DVD.
Which should have been added to the release blocker process when it got
added there.
From my point of view any handed out media at various events etc and
what's on it should be considered release blocker.
I've considered asking about making Xfce a blocking desktop, but I have
no idea how the LXDE and Sugar communities are with helping testing,
etc.
It would mean added burden on QA folks to test more stuff, and added
burden on maintainers of those desktops to create timely fixes for any
blocker issues that come up.
There is no such thing as added burden on QA + Me and James had already
solved that problem long ago but never found the time to implement it
like so many other things because we both where a bit busy with our
$dayjobs.
The solution was more or less this way
If an manpower to cover anything else then critical path became a
concern we should fetch that manpower from the relevant SIG's community.
Basically the plan was to reach out for example to the
Gnome/KDE/XFCE/LXDE/Sugar community's to ask for assistant to cover
their relevant part of required testing if that was the case.
If you think about it who are better qualified and more willing to test
those components other then the people that are using it on daily bases...
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
