On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:10 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > Having a desktop be a blocking desktop also somewhat assumes you'll be > getting QA volunteer time to run through your test cases, whereas when > it's not blocking there isn't that assumption. The SIG can still create > and validate their own test and release criteria, and propose something > as a blocker, but it's not guaranteed to be accepted. > > At least that's how I see it from when I was involved in the release > process. More or less, except we never take issues specific to non-blocking desktops as blockers; it's not a discretionary thing, it's just a straight line. By policy, a bug specific to Xfce or LXDE (or any other desktop beside KDE/GNOME) cannot block release. Bugs in non-blocking desktops that would block release if they were in blocking desktops are automatically given NTH status. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
