On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:54:08AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > There's every indication that were we to so choose, Microsoft would happily > sign our binaries and allow us to boot on Secure Boot constrained ARM > machines at no additional cost. We believe that without the guarantee that > you can disable Secure Boot or use your own chain of trust, it isn't a > platform we can or should support. To emphasise this point - Microsoft will sign EBC objects, so it's not obvious that there's any way they *could* block a bootloader for ARM devices. We're just choosing not to. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
