On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> I am more concerned about the package maintenance level. At the >> package maintenance level, it does not make sense to patch against the >> upstream decision. > > It does. If upstream arbitrarily refuses to support a use case we support, > that must be patched. > > Now I don't think Fedora should be supporting "Secure" Boot in the first > place, but if it does, it needs to be distro-wide. > You mean like pulseaudio, which is still a horrid mess after 11(?) releases? Sorry, I respectfully disagree. Best, Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
