On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jared K. Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't >> support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora. > > Just for the sake of argument, our Amazon EC2 images aren't using > Anaconda for installation, but they're still considered part of > Fedora. I think that's more akin to a spin. > I agree with the sentiment that Anaconda should be a requirement for > instances where it makes sense to boot from bootable media > (DVD/CD/USB) and install via Anaconda, but in the case of ARM, the > traditional installation method is often "copy an image to an SD (or > micro-SD) card and then boot from that card. Just to make sure I'm > clear, are you insisting that the software tool that puts the image on > the SD card be Anaconda, or are you OK with some other Fedora-approved > tool for doing so? > > -- > Jared Smith > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
