Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't
> support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.

Just for the sake of argument, our Amazon EC2 images aren't using
Anaconda for installation, but they're still considered part of
Fedora.

I agree with the sentiment that Anaconda should be a requirement for
instances where it makes sense to boot from bootable media
(DVD/CD/USB) and install via Anaconda, but in the case of ARM, the
traditional installation method is often "copy an image to an SD (or
micro-SD) card and then boot from that card.  Just to make sure I'm
clear, are you insisting that the software tool that puts the image on
the SD card be Anaconda, or are you OK with some other Fedora-approved
tool for doing so?

--
Jared Smith
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux