Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:33:44PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 07:00 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >After some tweaking, these are now accepted as
> >https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements
> >
> 
> Fail to see the reasoning why Anaconda and the "Installer team" are
> involved in these requirements care to elaborate how/why FESCo fits
> them into the bigger picture?

Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't 
support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux