Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/23/2012 12:54 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other installers and even
installing methods ( think like the distribution would be flashed to a
device in the maybe not to distant future instead of being installed in
the traditional sense as we know it to be ) are not allowed or otherwise
considered to be part of the distribution should some community members
want to writer and or package an alternative installer to ship and use
on their spin?

It's not about anaconda specifically, it's about having a standard installer experience across all PAs to the extent technically sensible. Maybe something else will supplant anaconda in time.

--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux