On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:59 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > It's not about anaconda specifically, it's about having a standard > installer experience across all PAs to the extent technically sensible. > Maybe something else will supplant anaconda in time. FWIW, in writing the QA release criteria, we used the generic term 'the installer' rather than the specific 'anaconda' to avoid this kind of ambiguity. In general I tend to prefer the use of generic terms in this kind of policy document for exactly this reason - to acknowledge and protect against the possibility of the currently-favoured implementation of any particular thing changing in future. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
