Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/4/23 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 04/23/2012 07:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>
>> Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't
>> support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.
>
> So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other installers and even installing
> methods ( think like the distribution would be flashed to a device in the
> maybe not to distant future instead of being installed in the traditional
> sense as we know it to be ) are not allowed or otherwise considered to be
> part of the distribution should some community members want to writer and or
> package an alternative installer to ship and use on their spin?

I think it wasn't so much forbidding alternate methods as requiring
that the primary one be supported.

-J

> JBG
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux