Re: ARM as a primary architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/22/2012 01:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I would still like you to consider the question of whether this holds
for the Fedora case, though. Is Fedora as a project in fact suitable -
either in current implementation, or in terms of our self-definition and
long term goals - for this whole 'market' you are identifying as a
single entity? Are we in fact truly interested in producing code for
these content consumption devices? Is that what we're doing?

#include <outofscope.h>

Fedora is not currently suitable for mobile devices. The majority of end users want content consumption, not content creation, devices. The fact that computers up to this point have been general purpose enough to be both is why we're all here having this conversation. I'm not saying Fedora is going to save the world, but it can certainly save itself by making sure that future content-consumption devices can also be used for content creation. It's the hardware that the majority of all future developers-in-potential are going to own.

--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux