Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/03/12 12:53, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> I'm afraid we end up with more bureaucracy than we have now. I'm not
> against tracking some statistics, so you can look up who is active and
> probably will answer in few days, but I'd rather not use it for the
> unresponsive process.
> 
> Marcela

I'm thinking about how to support Jóhann with a proven packager (or
two). Since it seems not wanted by Fesco, to give him the corresponding
rights to commit his changes directly? This final target (all services
are supported by systemd) seems to be clear to everyone.
-- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
               <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux