Dne 2.3.2012 12:56, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" napsal(a):
On 03/02/2012 11:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Actually I support such initiative. We have also filled a few bugs
against Ruby components which needs some love due to Ruby update and
it happens that we have no response. If there would be tool that
reports "yes, the maintainer was active in some Fedora project 3 days
ago", then it would be meaningful to nag him again, because the BZ
was probably somewhere lost/forgotten, but if you see that the
maintainer have been non-active for last 6 months, you know that you
should probably start "NonResponsiveMaintainer" process.
Yeah I suspected that I was not alone in this regard since I am just
dealing with ca 5% of packages in the distribution.
This could be beneficial in various project processes although I'm not
familiar with how FPC ensures that FPG is being followed and is
updated each time changes are made to the guidelines but let's assume
they are using this workflow.
Are the changes enforced? I don't think so ...
Vit
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
