On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 13:22 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 15.02.2012 13:43, schrieb Martin Langhoff: > >> On Feb 15, 2012 6:16 AM, "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> <mailto:h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > >>> there is no single reason for a feature like /usrmove which > >>> in fact nobody NEEDS at all and definitly not now to press > >>> it into the next release with pressure > >> > >> You are wrong. The /usr move has a very clear impact in being able > >> to snapshot your OS install partition. Add > >> btrfs, yum hooks and the already-implemented "stateless" > >> configuration and you have a really major feature: a fully > >> upgrade/test/rollback setup for Fedora. > > > > only one out of a million installations have /usr seperated > > from / and the default is NOT do this - so no there is no > > impact on any normal setup > > Prior to F17, I've always put /usr on a partition separate from /. > > $ df -hT / /usr > Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda4 ext4 11G 7.3G 3.2G 70% / > /dev/sda6 ext4 10G 7.3G 2.3G 77% /usr > > I know I'm special ;-), but *that* special? I doubt it. I guess it is time to change habits, what's the point of a separate /usr these days ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
