Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 15.02.2012 13:43, schrieb Martin Langhoff: >> On Feb 15, 2012 6:16 AM, "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> there is no single reason for a feature like /usrmove which >>> in fact nobody NEEDS at all and definitly not now to press >>> it into the next release with pressure >> >> You are wrong. The /usr move has a very clear impact in being able >> to snapshot your OS install partition. Add >> btrfs, yum hooks and the already-implemented "stateless" >> configuration and you have a really major feature: a fully >> upgrade/test/rollback setup for Fedora. > > only one out of a million installations have /usr seperated > from / and the default is NOT do this - so no there is no > impact on any normal setup Prior to F17, I've always put /usr on a partition separate from /. $ df -hT / /usr Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda4 ext4 11G 7.3G 3.2G 70% / /dev/sda6 ext4 10G 7.3G 2.3G 77% /usr I know I'm special ;-), but *that* special? I doubt it. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
