On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:12:37PM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:39:47AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:58:32AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > > Yes, FESCo > > > * should have recognized early that the scope of the feature was not > > > thought through and that more pieces are needed (contrary to claims > > > back in the end of October that "everything is already implemented and > > > works") > > > > > <nod> So one idea would be that a specific FESCo member needs to step up to > > be the "collaboration guide" (Must think of a better name for that :-) for > > a feature. They would be in charge of the feature, watch it as it evolves. > > Pick apart all the points where it requires coordination with other groups. > > And make sure that those groups were informed that the feature was in > > progress. > > Feature Shepherd? Yeah -- but having more than one of them. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpaOm04gZPq0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
