On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:57:18PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 10.02.2012 16:49, schrieb Steve Gordon: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> So the likely effect is that these features will be called ready > >>> whenever > >>> they need to be (according to the process) with the rest simply > >>> called > >>> "optimizing". > >> > >> if people do not care the can destroy every process > >> if someone calls repeatly non-ready features as ready > >> he is the wrong person for any sort of decision > >> > >> maybe the project should get rid of some people who > >> do not care or guidelines which have the power to > >> ENFORCE contributors or get rid of them > >> > >> yes this may sound hard > >> but what is the alternative? > >> > >> burn down ressources with each relese more and more > > > > Where can I review your formal submission(s) for such improvements? > > they do not exist because fedoras feature-quality at release > burns down way to much of my time to maintain > 20 machines > with fedora and rebuild half of the distribution to fix > design bugs > > so if the releases would be more well thought i would have > time to write such things, but then there would be no need for it I haven't seen much tangible change in the direction Fedora is heading as a result of all your emails, spending some of that time on formal suggestions for improvement may change this. Cheers, Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
