Am 09.02.2012 02:01, schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:49:13 +0100 > Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> to say it in other words: >> >> the overall release-quality of fedora was MUCH better as long >> Redhat controlled it and before everybody could propose hughe >> changes in all sorts of subsystems as long he finds some >> peopole agree and not enough disagreing loud enough > > srpms by release: > > Fedora Core 6: 1154 > Fedora 17: 25927 > > Thats a LOT smaller set of software. ;) > Of course there's a lot more people working on things... this is not right these days there were "Fedora Core" and "Fedora Extras" "Fedora Extras" was the "community repo" "Fedora Core" was controlled by Redhat only and using Fedora since FC3 and since FC6 on all machines i own i notice quality problems in the core-distribution at release times which did not happen in days of "Fedora Core" because changes on the core system were done with much more care than these days
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
