On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:13:09PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:52 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > > It certainly has a different soname, so yeah, we can have a -compat > > package. But that would still mean a ton of stuff busted for rebuilds > > while packages get fixed up. A few upstream packages already work with > > libnl2, and the delta between 2 and 3 is hugely smaller than from 1 to > > 3. > > I don't think rebuilds are as big an issue as broken compatibility. I'd > recommend carrying compat-libnl1 for at least one Fedora release while > we port the affected applications to libnl 3. Hi, Dan, have you decided on whether there will be a compat library? Thanks! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
