Dan Williams (dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > I believe libnl3 *might* be parallel installable; I've had conversations > with tgraf about how to make it so. I'll investigate once the upstream > git repo comes back online. In the past the problem was mainly with the > devel package and the location of the headers and the .pc file (ie, it > was always /usr/include/netlink no matter what the version of libnl) but > I believe Thomas fixed that earlier this summer for libnl3. I'm less concerned about the old version being around to develop against - I'd just rather not have the whole repo hae issues while people are still porting. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel