On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:52 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > It certainly has a different soname, so yeah, we can have a -compat > package. But that would still mean a ton of stuff busted for rebuilds > while packages get fixed up. A few upstream packages already work with > libnl2, and the delta between 2 and 3 is hugely smaller than from 1 to > 3. I don't think rebuilds are as big an issue as broken compatibility. I'd recommend carrying compat-libnl1 for at least one Fedora release while we port the affected applications to libnl 3.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
