Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 08:32 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

> You snipped the part where Kevin wrote "[...] if the maintainer
> demonstrates incompetence at taking these decisions, the offending
> maintainer needs to be replaced."  The problem here appears to be a
> human one, not something that software is going to fix any time soon.

Sure. But in the meantime, the software sure is mitigating the problem.

(Getting humans replaced is something of an arduous process, in Fedora.)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux