On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 17:04 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > The fail(*), imo, was with 12.999 going stable containing known-regressions. > So, any suggestions, if any, to prevent any similar series of events? We have lots of suggestions. As I've said at least fifty times, it's pointless going too far with the slapping of band-aids on the current karma system, because it's fundamentally too simplistic: it's never going to be perfect and there is a definite point of diminishing returns if we keep screwing with it. What we need is the non-numeric karma system which Bodhi 2.0 is supposed to be bringing in. No amount of tweaking with the rules of Bodhi 1.0 is going to Magically Solve Everything, because '1, 0, -1' is simply too limited a vocabulary to express everything we need to express about updates. While we're fiddling, though, I do think negative karma should have more value than it currently does. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
