Am 08.10.2011 21:40, schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500 > Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated >>> version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly. >>> >>> What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's? >>> >>> Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months >>> after the competition. >> >> Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting. > > I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the > maintainers before asking FESCo. > > On the pro side we have: > > - Wine needs it. > > On the con side we have: > > - Lots of changes? (I have no idea). > - High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes? all articles i read in the past said for the developers the 1.0 is only a number - on the other side Lennart will push it only to F17 - why? http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/17548/pulseaudio-erreicht-version-10.html > Die Entwickler selbst sprechen allerdings nur von einer Zahl, die keinerlei > Bedeutung habe. Als Grund für die Freigabe der Version 1.0 nennen sie zum > einen den breiten Einsatz des Systems und zum anderen den Willen, die > Versionierung vereinfachen zu wollen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
