On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500 > Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated >> > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly. >> > >> > What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's? >> > >> > Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months >> > after the competition. >> >> Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting. > > I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the > maintainers before asking FESCo. > > On the pro side we have: > > - Wine needs it. > > On the con side we have: > > - Lots of changes? (I have no idea). > - High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes? > > Perhaps maintainer(s) could explain why they are reluctant to push this > into f16 with more specificity? Well we're suppose to be stabilising, its not in rawhide yet so any form of impact can even be assessed and personally I would trust the maintainer as he's also one of the upstream maintainers. Also reading the reference bugs about wine I'd like to point out the following: 1) Wine audio is broken since F-15 as per bug # 28622 so this is not a regression 2) To quote bug # 10495 - "Yes, PulseAudio is supported through its ALSA compatibility plugin. It's possible that a PulseAudio driver might happen at some point, but there's no plans for one at the moment." 3) I don't believe from reading the bugs that the wine problem will be fixed by adding PA 1.0 but there might be a patch that could be added to either PA or wine to fix or at least improve the problem. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
