Re: PA 1.0 for FC16?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
> > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
> >
> > What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's?
> >
> > Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months
> > after the competition.
> 
> Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting.

I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the
maintainers before asking FESCo. 

On the pro side we have: 

- Wine needs it. 

On the con side we have: 

- Lots of changes? (I have no idea). 
- High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes?

Perhaps maintainer(s) could explain why they are reluctant to push this
into f16 with more specificity? 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux