Re: PA 1.0 for FC16?

[Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>]

There were a lot of changes[1], but the only program I know of that would absolutely break from those changes is padevchooser, which has long since been recommended and not usable, since avahi takes care of that quite nicely.

[1]: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Notes/1.0

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
> > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
> >
> > What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's?
> >
> > Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months
> > after the competition.
>
> Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting.

I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the
maintainers before asking FESCo.

On the pro side we have:

- Wine needs it.

On the con side we have:

- Lots of changes? (I have no idea).
- High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes?

Perhaps maintainer(s) could explain why they are reluctant to push this
into f16 with more specificity?

kevin

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel