Eerm, I mean recommended as not usable. Using padevchooser breaks most PulseAudio environments even now, so don't use it. 2011/10/8 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> > There were a lot of changes[1], but the only program I know of that would > absolutely break from those changes is padevchooser, which has long since > been recommended and not usable, since avahi takes care of that quite > nicely. > > [1]: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Notes/1.0 > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500 >> Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> > > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated >> > > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly. >> > > >> > > What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's? >> > > >> > > Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months >> > > after the competition. >> > >> > Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting. >> >> I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the >> maintainers before asking FESCo. >> >> On the pro side we have: >> >> - Wine needs it. >> >> On the con side we have: >> >> - Lots of changes? (I have no idea). >> - High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes? >> >> Perhaps maintainer(s) could explain why they are reluctant to push this >> into f16 with more specificity? >> >> kevin >> >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > >
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
