On 09/16/2011 08:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Were not? From:On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:48 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:On 09/16/2011 05:01 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:17:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:True. As far as GNOME goes, though, whenever you suggest 'bulletproof session management', they say 'that's what suspend is for'...I'd like to see proper session management. However, the existing X protocol is terrible (a KDE'er talked about the horrors @ Desktop Summit), and session management itself is really difficult.Temptinh as it might be, just please keep session management away from the init daemon and let it do its one important job properly, robustly and well and not suffer the path to sure death of trying to be all things - just coz it can coz its PID 1,2, 3 etc.We aren't really talking about systemd any more, in this branch of the thread. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd systemd System and Session Manager --
Stephen Clark NetWolves Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netwolves.com |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
