On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/14/2011 04:31 PM, drago01 wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones<rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:03:04AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> 2011/9/13 Tom Lane<tgl@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>> (This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0 >>>>> for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd >>>>> files.) >>>> >>>> I used this service file on F15 and it starts slower >>>> 4214ms postgresql.service >>>> >>>> if we compare with an old SysVinit script >>>> 2469ms postgresql.service >>>> >>>> So I wonder if it makes sense to convert in such case? >>>> >>>> (I know that it is not about boot speed, it can start slower if needed.) >>> >>> Is systemd boot actually any faster? > > Not from my personal experience. > >>> There seems to be no >>> noticable difference in boot times for me over whatever we >>> were using in F14. ie. both methods still takes ages, far >>> longer than should be necessary. >> >> My laptop (using a Samsung ssd) booted up in 14-16 seconds on F14. Now >> (F15) it boots up in 7-8 seconds. Which is a rather huge boost. (Not >> using lvm or any fancy stuff). > > My netbook boots up F14 in ca. 60 secs, while F15 boots up in 62 secs. > I'd call this "below measurement accuracy". What kind of disk is that? For a mechanical drive any gain from parallel startup would get killed by disk seeks. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
