On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:48 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 09/16/2011 05:01 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:17:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> True. As far as GNOME goes, though, whenever you suggest 'bulletproof > >> session management', they say 'that's what suspend is for'... > > > > I'd like to see proper session management. However, the existing > > X protocol is terrible (a KDE'er talked about the horrors @ Desktop > > Summit), and session management itself is really difficult. > > > Temptinh as it might be, just please keep session management away from > the init daemon and let it do its one important job properly, robustly > and well and not suffer the path to sure death of trying to be all > things - just coz it can coz its PID 1,2, 3 etc. We aren't really talking about systemd any more, in this branch of the thread. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
