On 09/16/2011 05:01 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:17:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> True. As far as GNOME goes, though, whenever you suggest 'bulletproof >> session management', they say 'that's what suspend is for'... > > I'd like to see proper session management. However, the existing > X protocol is terrible (a KDE'er talked about the horrors @ Desktop > Summit), and session management itself is really difficult. Temptinh as it might be, just please keep session management away from the init daemon and let it do its one important job properly, robustly and well and not suffer the path to sure death of trying to be all things - just coz it can coz its PID 1,2, 3 etc. :-) Let the Wayland, KDE, LXDE, Gnome etc daemons each deal with their own things. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
